The 30-Day Recap (TL;DR)

Index at 7 September 2026: 85 verified models, 248 speed figures across 16 Apple Silicon chips — 238 estimated from the published bandwidth model, 5 vendor-sourced, 5 community-measured. Every figure on this page carries its label.

Qwen3.8-27B Takes #1 — as Predicted

Alibaba published Qwen3.8-27B on 14 August under Apache 2.0, and it now sits at the top of the leaderboard with a LLMCheck Score of 71, one point ahead of DeepSeek V4 Flash and the model it replaces, Qwen 3.6-27B, which drops to #6.

What changed between the generations is not the parameter count — 27B to 27.8B — but what the model does with it. Qwen3.8-27B is a native vision-language model that takes images and video, runs a 262,144-token context natively (1M with YaRN), and exposes a thinking mode with three reasoning_effort levels. The model card reports SWE-Bench Pro 61.7 and Terminal-Bench 2.1 73.0 — both on the vendor’s own scaffold, which the index annotates because vendor scaffolds typically run 15–20 points above standardized harnesses — plus LiveCodeBench v6 90.3 and GPQA Diamond 89.2.

For a Mac buyer the practical facts are unchanged from the 3.6 generation: about 19 GB at 4-bit, so it fits a 24 GB machine, and roughly 29 tok/s estimated on an M5 Max. The ecosystem caught up fast — over a thousand GGUF variants are listed, and Ollama, llama.cpp and LM Studio all run it.

One correction to our own record. The August edition’s speculative section called this release for mid-August and said the leaderboard would change if it came in under Apache 2.0. Both held. The same section predicted the M5 Mac Studio would slip to late 2026 on RAM shortages; Apple announced it on 25 August and ships it on 22 September. We were wrong about that one.

GLM-5.3-Flash — the Ox Alpha Model, MIT, on a Mac Studio

For most of August an unattributed model called “Ox Alpha” was drawing attention on evaluation arenas. On 26 August Zhipu identified it as GLM-5.3-Flash and released the weights under MIT on Hugging Face.

The shape is the story. 320B total parameters, 18B active per token, the first natively multimodal model in the GLM-5 series, and a hybrid of sparse and linear attention that the card says cuts long-context serving cost. The one benchmark on the card is Terminal-Bench 2.1 at 84.3 — for scale, Qwen3.8-27B reports 73.0 on the same benchmark. Zhipu’s own line is that it outperforms GLM-5.2 across its benchmarks and approaches Claude Opus 4.8 on coding and agentic work. No SWE-Bench Pro figure was published on the card as of 7 September, so the index scores it at 48 on the evidence it has.

Whether it fits a Mac comes down to quantization, and Unsloth’s dynamic GGUFs make the tiers explicit:

QuantSizeSmallest Mac that holds itEstimated speed
UD-IQ3_XXS (3-bit)120 GB128 GB — M5 Max or M4 Max, tight~27 tok/s est. (M5 Max)
UD-IQ4_XS157 GB192 GB M4 Ultra~32 tok/s est.
UD-Q4_K_XL (4-bit)200 GB256 GB M5 Ultra / M3 Ultra~35 tok/s est. (M5 Ultra), ~25 (M3 Ultra)
BF16650 GBNothing Apple sells

Two caveats. The GGUFs need a GLM-5-aware llama.cpp branch as of this writing rather than a stock release, and the MLX route is community conversions. And the speeds are estimates using the index’s new MoE factor; a 3-bit quant on a 128 GB machine leaves 8 GB for everything else, which is a real constraint on context length. It ranks #10 with a Score of 68 because the 128 GB floor costs it accessibility points — by design. Capability alone would put it near the top.

And the flagship: GLM-5.3

Flash was not Zhipu’s only release. GLM-5.3 — the post-training upgrade of GLM 5.2 on the same 753B mixture-of-experts base, about 40B active — went out through Zhipu’s API on 18 August, and the weights followed on 25 August, the day the index last cut its data, which is how it was missed until this edition. The card reports Terminal-Bench 2.1 at 88.2 and DeepSWE v1.1 at 66.9; the headline gain over 5.2 is Terminal-Bench 3.0 moving from 4.6 to 28.3.

The license is the part to read. GLM 5.2 is MIT. GLM-5.3 ships under a bespoke GLM-5.3 License: commercial use permitted, attribution required, and one gate — model-as-a-service operators whose aggregate revenue exceeds US$10 billion over twelve months must pass Z.AI’s security review. For a Mac owner, or nearly any business, that is MIT in practice, and the index scores it 9/10, one point under MIT, in the same tier as Kimi’s Modified MIT. It is the first time Zhipu has split its licensing between a Flash and a flagship, and the direction is worth noting. A 2-bit quant is 239 GB, so it starts at a 256 GB Studio — about 29 tok/s estimated on an M5 Ultra — and it enters the index at #8 with a capability score of 50.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next — 6B Active and a License Clause to Read

Released the same day as GLM-5.3-Flash, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is the one Alibaba describes as a preview of the architecture that will underpin Qwen4: 125B parameters with 6B activated per token, plus a 51B n-gram embedding and a 4B multi-token-prediction head; Gated DeltaNet paired with Qwen Sparse Attention across 48 layers; 512 experts of which 10 routed and 1 shared fire per token. Native text, image and video input. A 262K context, 1M with YaRN. Thinking on by default with the same three effort levels as the 27B.

The card reports SWE-Bench Pro 62.5 (vendor scaffold), LiveCodeBench v6 91.9 and GPQA Diamond 91.7 — each a little above Qwen3.8-27B — and the index scores it at 47.

The number that matters for a Mac is 112 GB: the size of the community 4-bit MLX conversion. The 51B n-gram table lives in memory with everything else, so this is a 128 GB-tier model, not a 96 GB one. At that tier it is fast for what it is — about 49 tok/s estimated on an M5 Max, 78 on an M4 Ultra, 85 on an M5 Ultra — because only 6B parameters stream per token. The generators that build our per-Mac pages now pick it as the top model on every 128 GB-and-up configuration, from the MacBook Pro M5 Max to the 512 GB Studio. It ranks #13 overall because, like GLM-5.3-Flash, the RAM floor costs it points.

Read the license before you build on it. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next ships under Qwen Community 1.0, not Apache 2.0. Running it locally, including inside your own company, is unrestricted. But offering it as a model-as-a-service, or shipping an “AI Work Assistant” product for coding or office productivity on it, requires a separate commercial license from Alibaba — and products past 100M monthly users or US$20M monthly revenue must display the model name prominently. That coding-assistant carve-out is exactly the use case many local-LLM readers have in mind, which is why the index scores the license as Qwen Custom (5/10) rather than Apache (8/10).

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision-Exp

DeepSeek ran V4-Flash-Vision-Exp API-only from 21 to 30 August, then published the full weights on 31 August under plain MIT. It is V4 Flash with visual modules added and continued training on top — 305B total against the text model’s 284B, the same 13B-active decode path — and the card calls it experimental in so many words.

It reaches a Mac through Unsloth GGUFs: 2-bit at 91–97 GB for a 128 GB machine, 4-bit at 137–155 GB for a 192 GB Studio. Image input needs llama.cpp b10766 or later. The index lists it at #3 with the text model’s capability score of 47, because no independent vision benchmark has been verified yet, and estimates its speed by anchoring to V4 Flash’s community-measured 39 tok/s on M5 Max — same decode path, same number, labelled estimated until someone measures the vision checkpoint itself.

Muse Spark 1.3 — Still Closed

Meta released Muse Spark 1.3 on 2 September into its API and the Muse Code CLI, with the pitch that it asks clarifying questions, confirms before consequential actions, and cuts tool calls by about a fifth and tokens by about a quarter. It is not open weights. Mark Zuckerberg said open weights are coming “soon,” but what Meta has actually committed to releasing is version 1.2, without a date or license — and reporting this month put 1.2 behind Kimi K3, GLM-5.3 and Qwen3.8 on aggregate benchmarks. The index does not list a model until the weights exist. Muse Glimmer 30B, Meta’s Apache 2.0 release from July, remains the only open Muse.

For context, the closed frontier moved the same week: GPT-6 Astra on 3 September, Gemini 3.8 Flash on 2 September, Claude Fable 5.1 on 1 September. None of them affects a Mac leaderboard, except as the target the open models are chasing.

Calibration Note — Why a Published Figure Changed

The index estimates speed with a published two-term memory-bandwidth model fitted to vendor-measured dense runs. Sparse models need one more step. Their decode reads only the active parameters, which the naive formula rewards generously — it would put a 6B-active model at roughly 120 tok/s on an M5 Max. The index’s one community-measured MoE row, DeepSeek V4 Flash at 39 tok/s on M5 Max, comes in at 0.42 of that formula, and the MoE estimates already in the index all sat between 0.24 and 0.53 of it. Routing, expert loading and KV-cache traffic do not scale down with active size.

So from this edition every MoE estimate is the active-bytes formula scaled by 0.42, and that factor is documented on /methodology. Applying it consistently exposed one existing row that had been set with the unscaled formula: DeepSeek V4 Flash on M5 Ultra, published at ~80 tok/s in our 25 August coverage, is now ~47. The two Mac Studio posts that quoted the old figure carry a dated note. If you bought a 256 GB Studio on the strength of 80, the honest number is 47 until a measured run says otherwise, and a measured run is exactly what we want — the machine ships on 22 September.

Open-Source Top 10 (September 2026)

Ranked by LLMCheck Score, which weights capability alongside real Mac runnability — speed, RAM tier, license. The full 85-model table is on the leaderboard.

LLMCheck index Top 10 — September 2026.
#ModelScoreLicenseMin RAMSpeed (M5 Max)
1Qwen3.8-27B71Apache 2.019 GB29 tok/s est.
2DeepSeek V4 Flash70MIT120 GB39 tok/s community
3DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision-Exp70MIT120 GB39 tok/s est.
4KAT-Coder-V2.570Apache 2.024 GB52 tok/s est.
5Maple Preview 20B-A1B70MIT6 GB281 tok/s vendor
6Qwen 3.6-27B70Apache 2.018 GB30 tok/s est.
7GLM 5.269MIT256 GB22 tok/s community
8GLM-5.369GLM-5.3256 GB29 tok/s est.
9Nemotron 3.5 Lightning69OpenMDW18 GB60 tok/s est.
10Qwen 3.6-35B-A3B69Apache 2.024 GB52 tok/s est.

By Mac Tier — What to Run Today (September 2026)

Your MacRun thisWhy
16 GBMaple Preview 20B-A1BMIT, vendor-reported 200+ tok/s on a base M4; Bonsai 27B 1-bit is the quality pick on an M6 mini
24–32 GBQwen3.8-27BThe new #1: Apache 2.0, image and video input, ~19 GB at 4-bit — 8 tok/s est. on an M6 mini, 15 on an M5 Pro
48–64 GBQwen3.8-27BSame model with room for long context; ~29 tok/s est. on a 64 GB M5 Max
128 GBQwen3.8-Flash-NextQwen4 preview at ~49 tok/s est.; DeepSeek V4 Flash 2-bit at 39 tok/s community is the MIT alternative; GLM-5.3-Flash 3-bit fits, tightly
192 GBQwen3.8-Flash-Next~78 tok/s est. on M4 Ultra; GLM-5.3-Flash at IQ4_XS (157 GB) ~32 tok/s est.
256–512 GBQwen3.8-Flash-Next~85 tok/s est. on M5 Ultra; GLM-5.3-Flash at true 4-bit ~35 est.; DeepSeek V4 Flash 4-bit ~47 est.; the GLM-5.3 flagship at 2-bit ~29 est. All estimates until the Studio ships

Per-Mac rankings for all 44 configurations are on Best LLM by Mac; the Mac Advisor turns a budget into a config.

What’s Coming Next Month

Speculative section. Each item carries its status; nothing here enters the index until weights exist on a primary source.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best open-source local LLM for a Mac in September 2026?

According to the LLMCheck index (September 2026), Qwen3.8-27B: LLMCheck Score 71, Apache 2.0, native image and video input, about 19 GB at 4-bit so it fits a 24 GB Mac, and roughly 29 tok/s estimated on an M5 Max. On 128 GB and larger Macs the index's per-Mac pages pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next instead.

Can a Mac run GLM-5.3-Flash?

Yes, from 128 GB up. Unsloth's 3-bit UD-IQ3_XXS quant is 120 GB and fits an M5 Max or M4 Max with 128 GB, leaving little headroom; the 157 GB IQ4_XS fits a 192 GB M4 Ultra; true 4-bit at 200 GB needs a 256 GB or 512 GB Studio. As of 7 September the GGUFs need a GLM-5-aware llama.cpp branch, and MLX support comes from community conversions. Estimated speed is about 27 tok/s on M5 Max at 3-bit and 35 on M5 Ultra at 4-bit.

Is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next free for commercial use?

Partly. The Qwen Community 1.0 license permits commercial use and internal use without restriction, but model-as-a-service offerings and AI Work Assistant products for coding or office productivity require a separate commercial license from Alibaba, and products above 100 million monthly active users or US$20 million in monthly revenue must display the model name prominently. It is not Apache 2.0; the index scores it as Qwen Custom.

Does DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision run on a Mac?

With a 128 GB Mac and a current llama.cpp, yes. Unsloth's 2-bit GGUFs are 91 to 97 GB; image input needs llama.cpp build b10766 or later. The model is MIT-licensed and explicitly experimental. Its text capability is inherited from V4 Flash, and the index estimates its speed at about 39 tok/s on M5 Max by anchoring to V4 Flash's community-measured run.

Why did the DeepSeek V4 Flash M5 Ultra figure change from 80 to 47 tok/s?

The 80 was produced by applying the index's dense bandwidth model to a sparse model without correction. The index's one community-measured MoE run (V4 Flash on M5 Max, 39 tok/s) lands at 0.42 of that formula, and every existing MoE estimate fell between 0.24 and 0.53 of it, so from September all MoE estimates are scaled by 0.42. The M5 Ultra row is now 47 tok/s and the posts that quoted 80 carry a dated correction.

Are Muse Spark 1.3 weights available?

No. Muse Spark 1.3 is available through Meta's API and Muse Code CLI only. Meta has said open weights are coming soon, but the commitment on record is for version 1.2, with no date or license published. The index lists no model until its weights are on a primary source; Muse Glimmer 30B remains the only open Muse.