📊 Updated April 2026 · 46 Models

Open LLM Leaderboard for Mac

According to LLMCheck benchmarks, the top-ranked local LLM for Mac in April 2026 is Alibaba's Qwen 3.6-35B-A3B (LLMCheck Score: 69/100) — a 35B MoE that activates only 3B parameters per token, scoring 73.4% on SWE-bench Verified at ~52 tok/s on a 24 GB Mac. The fastest model is Gemma 4 E2B at ~155 tok/s. This leaderboard ranks 50 models by a composite score combining capability (50%), Apple Silicon speed (25%), accessibility (15%), and license openness (10%).

Every major open-source and frontier AI model ranked by LLMCheck Score — capability, speed on Apple Silicon (M5 Max tok/s), minimum RAM, and license openness. Filter by what fits in your Mac's memory, from 8 GB MacBook Air to 192 GB Mac Studio.

⚡ Top pick per RAM tier

8 GB Mac
Phi-4 Mini
~135 tok/s · MIT · Score 64
16 GB Mac
Qwen 3 14B
~55 tok/s · Apache 2.0 · Score 54
24–32 GB Mac
Qwen 3 30B-A3B
~58 tok/s · Apache 2.0 · Score 55
64 GB Mac
DeepSeek R1 70B
~10 tok/s · MIT · Score 48
128 GB Mac
GPT-oss 120B
~7 tok/s · Apache 2.0 · Score 44
Server Only
Kimi K2.5
600 GB+ RAM · MIT · Score 60
Filter:
Sort:
LLMCheck Score = Capability (50 pts) + Mac Speed on M5 Max (25 pts) + Accessibility (15 pts) + License Openness (10 pts). ≥ 60 Excellent 45–59 Good < 45 Limited  · tok/s estimates based on M5 Max 128 GB memory bandwidth (~600 GB/s). Models requiring >128 GB show "Server Only".
# Model Params Context License Min RAM M5 Max tok/s Score

About This Leaderboard

The LLMCheck Leaderboard ranks 42 large language models specifically for Mac users on Apple Silicon. According to LLMCheck benchmarks, every model is evaluated on its practical utility for local inference — how capable it is, how fast it runs, how much memory it needs, and how freely it can be used.

LLMCheck Score (0–100) is a composite metric: Capability (50 pts) sourced from Arena AI ELO ratings, MMLU, and coding benchmarks; Mac Speed (25 pts) based on tokens/sec on M5 Max 128 GB; Accessibility (15 pts) inversely scaled to minimum RAM; License Openness (10 pts). Full formula and per-model source citations available at our methodology page.

All benchmark data is available for download at llmcheck.net/data/ under CC BY 4.0 license. Real-world speeds vary by quantization, context length, and software. Models requiring more than 128 GB unified memory are marked Server Only. All data updated April 2026. Compare models interactively at the model comparator.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best LLM for Mac in 2026?

Based on LLMCheck's April 2026 leaderboard data, Gemma 4 26B-A4B (score 67) is the top-ranked model — a 26B MoE with 3.8B active params, ~48 tok/s on 24 GB Macs, multimodal with Arena AI #6 quality. For 8 GB Macs, Qwen 3.5 9B (score 66, ~100 tok/s) and Gemma 4 E4B (score 64, ~125 tok/s with image+audio input) are excellent. The fastest model is Gemma 4 E2B at ~155 tok/s.

Which LLMs can run on a Mac with 16 GB RAM?

On a 16 GB Mac (M3, M4, or M5 chip), models up to ~12 GB in INT4 quantization run comfortably. Top choices include Qwen 3 14B (~55 tok/s), Gemma 3 12B (~65 tok/s), and Qwen 2.5 14B (~55 tok/s). All 8 GB models — Qwen 3.5 9B, Qwen 3 8B, DeepSeek R1 8B, Llama 3.1 8B, Mistral 7B, Phi-4 Mini — also run extremely fast on 16 GB hardware.

Can DeepSeek R1 run on a Mac?

Yes. DeepSeek R1 has distilled variants for every Mac tier: DeepSeek R1 8B runs on 8 GB RAM (~95 tok/s, MIT), DeepSeek R1 32B requires 32 GB (~25 tok/s, MIT), and DeepSeek R1 70B needs 64 GB. The full DeepSeek R1 671B model is server-only (350 GB+ RAM). All variants are MIT licensed and available as GGUF files on Hugging Face.

What is the fastest LLM on Apple Silicon?

Estimated speeds on an M5 Max 128 GB: Phi-4 Mini ~135 tok/s, Mistral 7B ~118 tok/s, Llama 3.1 8B ~112 tok/s, Qwen 3.5 9B ~100 tok/s, Qwen 3 8B ~95 tok/s. Speed scales with Apple Silicon's unified memory bandwidth — the M5 Ultra 192 GB (~800 GB/s) is roughly 30% faster than M5 Max for the same model.

What is the difference between MoE and dense LLMs?

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have a large total parameter count but activate only a small fraction per token — this makes them faster and more RAM-efficient than a dense model of comparable quality. For example, Qwen 3 30B-A3B has 30B total parameters but only ~3B are active per token, running at ~58 tok/s on a 24 GB Mac. In contrast, a dense 30B model would need 64 GB and run at ~15 tok/s. MoE models are marked with a "MoE" badge in the leaderboard.

Can Kimi K2.5 run on a Mac?

No. Kimi K2.5 is a 1-trillion parameter MoE model from Moonshot AI that requires approximately 600 GB of RAM in INT4 quantization — far beyond any current Mac, including the M4 Ultra with 192 GB. It is only available via Moonshot AI's API at kimi.ai. It is MIT licensed for those with server infrastructure.

Which open source LLMs are best for coding on Mac?

Top coding models by Mac tier: 8 GB — DeepSeek R1 8B (MIT, strong chain-of-thought reasoning) or Qwen 3.5 9B (Apache 2.0, fast); 16–24 GB — Qwen 3 14B or Qwen 3 30B-A3B (Apache 2.0, excellent code generation); 128 GB — GPT-oss 120B (Apache 2.0, OpenAI's first open-weight model). For server-scale, DeepSeek V3 685B MoE is considered one of the best coding models in the world.

What is the LLMCheck Score?

The LLMCheck Score (0–100) ranks models specifically for Mac users. It combines: Capability (50 pts) from benchmark results; Mac Speed (25 pts) from tok/s on M5 Max 128 GB; Accessibility (15 pts) — models needing ≤8 GB RAM score 15, server-only models score 0; License Openness (10 pts) — MIT = 10, Apache 2.0 = 8, others score lower. Scores ≥60 are Excellent, 45–59 are Good, below 45 are Limited.