The Complete Apple Silicon AI Benchmark Table
According to LLMCheck testing, this table shows estimated inference speed across every major Apple Silicon variant. All speeds measured with Qwen 3.5 9B at Q4_K_M quantization unless noted.
| Chip | GPU Cores | Bandwidth | Max RAM | 9B tok/s | 30B tok/s | 70B tok/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M5 Generation (2025-2026) | ||||||
| M5 Max | 40 | ~600 GB/s | 128 GB | ~100 | ~35 | ~20 |
| M5 Pro | 20 | ~300 GB/s | 48 GB | ~55 | ~20 | N/A |
| M5 | 10 | ~150 GB/s | 32 GB | ~30 | N/A | N/A |
| M4 Generation (2024-2025) | ||||||
| M4 Max | 40 | ~546 GB/s | 128 GB | ~80 | ~28 | ~15 |
| M4 Pro | 20 | ~273 GB/s | 48 GB | ~50 | ~18 | N/A |
| M4 | 10 | ~120 GB/s | 32 GB | ~25 | N/A | N/A |
| M3 Generation (2023-2024) | ||||||
| M3 Max | 40 | ~400 GB/s | 128 GB | ~65 | ~22 | ~12 |
| M3 Pro | 18 | ~200 GB/s | 36 GB | ~35 | ~12 | N/A |
| M3 | 10 | ~100 GB/s | 24 GB | ~18 | N/A | N/A |
| M2 Generation (2022-2023) | ||||||
| M2 Ultra | 76 | ~800 GB/s | 192 GB | ~110 | ~38 | ~25 |
| M2 Max | 38 | ~400 GB/s | 96 GB | ~60 | ~20 | ~10 |
| M2 Pro | 19 | ~200 GB/s | 32 GB | ~32 | N/A | N/A |
| M2 | 10 | ~100 GB/s | 24 GB | ~16 | N/A | N/A |
| M1 Generation (2020-2022) | ||||||
| M1 Ultra | 64 | ~800 GB/s | 128 GB | ~90 | ~30 | ~18 |
| M1 Max | 32 | ~400 GB/s | 64 GB | ~50 | ~16 | ~8 |
| M1 Pro | 16 | ~200 GB/s | 32 GB | ~28 | N/A | N/A |
| M1 | 8 | ~68 GB/s | 16 GB | ~12 | N/A | N/A |
N/A = model requires more RAM than the chip supports. According to LLMCheck, a model needs approximately 1.2-1.5x its file size in available Unified Memory (after macOS overhead of ~4-6 GB).
The Key Insight: Memory Bandwidth Determines Speed
According to LLMCheck benchmarks, memory bandwidth has the strongest correlation with AI inference speed — stronger than GPU core count, Neural Engine TOPS, or chip generation. Here's why:
LLMCheck testing shows this relationship holds across all Apple Silicon chips: double the bandwidth, roughly double the tok/s.
Best Value Recommendations by Budget
| Budget | Best Mac | Chip / RAM | 9B tok/s | Max Model Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $599 | Mac Mini | M4 / 16 GB | ~25 | 9B (Q4) |
| $1,399 | Mac Mini | M4 Pro / 24 GB | ~50 | 14B (Q4) |
| $2,499 | MacBook Pro 16" | M5 Pro / 48 GB | ~55 | 30B MoE |
| $3,499+ | MacBook Pro 16" | M5 Max / 64 GB | ~100 | 35B MoE |
| $4,999+ | MacBook Pro 16" | M5 Max / 128 GB | ~100 | 70B (Q4) |
Generation-Over-Generation Improvement
According to LLMCheck benchmarks, each Apple Silicon generation brings meaningful AI performance gains:
| Upgrade Path | Bandwidth Gain | tok/s Gain | Worth It? |
|---|---|---|---|
| M1 Max → M2 Max | 0% (same) | ~20% | No (arch gains only) |
| M2 Max → M3 Max | 0% (same) | ~8% | No |
| M3 Max → M4 Max | +37% | +23% | Yes |
| M4 Max → M5 Max | +10% | +25% | Yes (Neural Accel.) |
| M1 → M5 (base) | +120% | +150% | Absolutely |
| M1 Max → M5 Max | +50% | +100% | Yes |
LLMCheck recommends upgrading if you're gaining 30%+ bandwidth or jumping 2+ generations. Skipping one generation (e.g., M3 to M5) typically delivers the best value.
Which Models Run on Which Chips?
According to LLMCheck's leaderboard data, here's what your Mac can handle:
| Your RAM | Best Models (Q4) | Max Params | Experience |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 GB | Phi-4 Mini, Llama 3.2 3B | ~4B | Fast chat, basic tasks |
| 16 GB | Qwen 3.5 9B, DeepSeek R1 8B | ~9B | Strong general-purpose AI |
| 24 GB | Qwen 3 30B-A3B (MoE) | ~14B dense / 30B MoE | Advanced reasoning |
| 32 GB | Qwen 3.5 35B (MoE) | ~20B dense / 35B MoE | Near-frontier capability |
| 48 GB | Llama 3.3 70B (partial offload) | ~35B dense | High-end reasoning |
| 64 GB | Llama 4 Scout, DeepSeek R1 70B | ~70B | Deep reasoning, research |
| 128 GB | Qwen 3.5 122B, Llama 3.1 405B (Q2) | ~122B | Frontier-class |
| 192 GB (Ultra) | Full Llama 3.1 405B (Q4) | ~400B+ | Server-class on desktop |